The true nature of Unidentified Flying Objects is a topic held in a vice of hardened beliefs. The UFOology community is divided down lines of frenetic insistence. This is divided by but not exclusive to binary views. First is the belief that every sighting threatens human civilization and is evil in origin. Secondly, the insights of Dr. Greer / Cameron Grant – that aliens have peaceful intentions and exist somewhere between the material plane we occupy and the inter-dimensional origins of consciousness.

A Rational View?
The latter is based on the idea that any civilization that has lived long enough not to destroy itself has mastered peaceful coexistence with all other lifeforms.

Additionally, to master interstellar / inter-dimensional travel, they will have to understand physics akin to realizing the oneness principles of the cosmos; an advanced living comprehension of Cosmic Karma – what one does to others, one does to oneself. Harming us would be harming themselves.

What the Rest Think
The remainder of the public sit outside of this circle. They range from being pro-active balkers to mildly inquisitive fence-sitters. They also consist of those who claim that sightings by ‘trained military observers’ are explained by secret technology held by either the US and /or other major military powers of the world.

Others propose that smaller states could have invested strongly in secret military technology rather than in conventional weapons soon to be rendered obsolete by the speed at which the science, drone technology, AI.. are moving.

The Most Likely of Unlikelies?
There is another half-way-meets-all consideration. This viewpoint states that the relatively recent sightings and videos released by the Pentagon could be secret technology that has been back-engineered from crashed UFO/s at incidents such as Roswell in New Mexico, 1947.

This theory usually follows a line of reasoning that those responsible for researching such powerful technology will have learned the lessons of nuclear proliferation. i.e. that – at all costs – the all-powerful back-engineered alien technology cannot be allowed to fall into the hands of adversary nations.

Personal Insights
This author has communicated with people, including icons from across the UFO community, including:

– Nick Pope (Former British Ministry of Defence / touted in mainstream media as ‘The Real Life X-files Guy),

– Dr. Garry Nolan (Former member To The Stars Academy and Professor of Microbiology and Immunology at Stanford University & known for controversially debunking the genetic origins of the alien Atacama mummy),

– George Knapp (Once pioneering journalist asking all the right questions about the activities at Area 51),

– Jeremy Corbell (director of Hunt for the Skinwalker and Bob Lazar: Area 51 & Flying Saucers).

Although all of the above have either outwardly stated or implied their beliefs that the nature of the UFO phenomenon represents a potential threat, I am still nowhere near convinced. I have maintained an open mind; otherwise, my insights are meaningless.

By contrast, many of the above claim to be unsure of the origins of UFOs yet have contradicted themselves by ceasing to ask the full range of questions available while calling them a threat. They have opted for something akin to: “I don’t know what they are, but they must be dangerous, that’s all I know, that – and – they go fast! Whew, do they go fast, and we should learn how to do that.’ (really).

Objectivity in Question
In 2017 / 18, I was more actively engaged within the community for research purposes. I was often put off by the outward aggressiveness displayed by supporters of the alien threat narrative. I was even turfed out of a social media group on the topic for expressing my open-mindedness regardless of how politely I communicated.

Thus questions surrounding their own ability to remain objective on the topic persisted for me. Are they too closely associated with those who want to defend the total secrecy of the actual origins of the technology until the last minute for the strategic benefit of those in (ultimate) power?

Set-Up for Fear
Since then, the list of those who have fallen in line with the fear agenda has expanded. Suppose you have been following the news since 2017 when the now-infamous Tic Tac footage taken from a US Navy jet of a UFO was released. In that case,, you will have noticed the increasingly serious position mainstream news readers are taking on the topic. This is despite many other videos being promised via the To The Stars Academy. Only two more have emerged since the (perhaps unexpected extent to which the) public was able to debunk the proposition that these crafts are with 100% certainty non-human in origin.

This was followed by two seasons of the TV show ‘Unidentified’ by the To The Stars Academy on the History Channel, which cleverly compounded the alien threat narrative by detailing a long list of military witnesses to similar events along the US coast and elsewhere, but primarily the US.

Confused Context: Mainstream Joins the Threat Narrative
When a reporter recently asked Trump about the recently announced a Depart of Defence UFO Task Force to investigate reports of UFOs, his answers provided the UFO community with yet more reasons to tighten the vice on previously held beliefs.

Leapfrogging Logic
Popular Mechanics (and other news media such as The Independent) ran with the idea that Trump just ‘threatened’ aliens. As a science news outlet, this is bizarre because it has completely neglected logic by leap-frogging the same discussions absent for the last 3 years and beyond.

There has been a distinct absence of attempts to ask common-sense questions if we are indeed heralding a new era of reality for humankind – where the confirmation of the existence of non-human intelligences was about to happen:

– What attempts at contact with these crafts have been made?

– What communications have been received back?

– If they have been determined a threat, why hasn’t this been discussed at the United Nations? etc.

Such an absence of common sense questions leads one to ask:
Suppose recent UFO sightings by the US military aren’t part of US weapons. Why has reference to the Advanced Aerospace Weapon Systems Applications Program (AAWSAP), which was tasked with investigating UFOs, been removed from the common online lexicon? (*At the time of writing, this was the case. A search for the term would lead to nothing but useless links with vague mention of it). The name AAWSAP seems to have been leaked and caused embarrassment for those pushing the threat narrative.

Engineering the Fake Alien Invasion
Additionally, such an interpretation of Trump’s recent words as a threat towards aliens is alarmist to those within the UFO community who have long been aware of the Last Card Warning to Dr. Carol Rosin via father of rocketry and NASA, Wernher Von Braun. Von Braun warned Carol that there was a planned fake alien invasion on the cards by those behind the scenes. He told her it would be an excuse to weaponize space, declare Marshal Law and take total control of the earth with new and secret technology.

Location is Everything
Thus statements by Trump (below) have reawakened suspicion over the origins purpose of these UFOs sightings since – if the so-called UFOs belonged to the US, it would explain why they have been filmed buzzing mostly US Navy pilots over the coast of the United States.
ie. If an accident were to occur, the priceless reverse-engineered technology would be recovered within US territory – thus not falling into the wrong hands.

Reading Between the Lines of Fear and Threat
Considering all of the above, along with the third-way proposition – that UFOs are mostly US hardware back-engineered from crashed UFOs, we get a different reading on Trump’s recent statements.

The Recent Statements:
I would like to invite you to think about the following logic:

First, consider Trump’s own response to being asked the following:
“Can you explain why the Department of Defence has set up a UFO task force? Are there UFOs?”

Trump: “I will tell you this: We have now created a military the likes of which we have never had before. In terms of equipment, the—the equipment we have, the weapons we have and hope to god we never have to use it. But have created a military the likes of which nobody has, nobody has ever had. Russia, China they’re all envious of what we had. All built in the USA. We’ve rebuilt it all—$2.5 trillion. As far as the other question, I’ll check on it; I heard about it two days ago, actually.”

The ‘other question‘ which he promises to check on is obviously in response to the setting up of a Department of Defence UFO task force since he also said in the same breath, “I heard about it two days ago,” ie. He hasn’t heard about UFOs until just two days ago.

This clarifies that it is in answer to the second part of the question, “Are there UFOs,” that he appears to brag about US military power. But why? While many interpreted this as meaning Don’t worry – I know about the aliens, and we can beat them, I instead took this to mean that recent reports, videos and sightings of UFOs are, in fact, hidden US military technology.

We should pause to consider the implications of this, as this opens up a whole culture of investigation in the UFO/UAP topic if this was his meaning.

Here’s why I think this has merit:

1) Trump’s own words:
Trump says:

– “A military the likes of which we have never had before.”
It can’t be conventional weapons he is talking about for it to be different from before.

– “We’ve rebuilt it all.“
Rebuilt it all – speaks for itself. This sounds like a complete renewal of hardware, not simple maintenance or up-grade of conventional weapons.

– “Rebuilt it all” … “In terms of the equipment.”
We really couldn’t get more specific than if he came out and said, ‘we replaced the equipment with back-engineered UFOs technology.’ This is pinpointing the hardware directly.

– “A military the likes of which nobody has ever had.”
A military the likes of which nobody has ever had would likely entail technology that no one has ever seen before, especially given the previous statement on equipment.

Also, we can’t forget that Trump has frequently and publicly bragged about his own preference for surprise attacks; military tactics are summed up by ‘Don’t tell them what you’ve got and don’t tell them you are coming!’

2) Possible Hint within the Article:
The article also hints at this by stating, ‘the president has spent approximately $2.5 trillion on defence, though there’s been no real increase in America’s overall military strength and number of weapons.’
There has been no actual increase in overall military strength. So where has the $2.5 trillion gone if not to projects behind the scenes?

Again, to refer to Trump’s own words in this context:
“We’ve built it all – $2.5 trillion.”
Built all what (?) with 2.5 trillion dollars if there is ‘no increase in overall military strength’ as far as the public can see?

So, once more, my key question is: by Trump answering with the above when asked, “Are there UFOs” – was he indicating that UFOs are, for the most part, in fact, US military technology?

Of course, this does not discount the possibility of these being back-engineered UFOs, meaning UFO fans could still get their disclosure this way. ie. When the new tech is unveiled, the source will be revealed.

The Remaining – Critical Questions
– How far will any President be persuaded to go along with the UFO threat narrative and use the technology to enforce agendas beyond the ability of both the public and Congress to fully assess the facts?

Think about this. What we cannot assess independently is not verifiable via democratic means.

– How quickly would any President be persuaded to unleash such firepower before we have had the chance to communicate with said intelligences?

If the situation is dictated by technology beyond our imagination and developed beyond democratic oversight, literally anything can happen.

– What would our use of technology that can travel far beyond orbit mean for our immediate diplomatic relations with any non-human intelligences?

How would we know whether non-human intelligences will take full exception to us going into orbit with such weapons with the determination that they are a threat? We are relative newcomers to the broader cosmic stage. We aren’t even sure if our own solar system is inhabited by an unseen intelligence. How would we know if we are breaking interspecies etiquette?

What does it mean for the destiny of human consciousness itself if UFOs are indeed explainable by Dr. Greer’s understanding of them being highly advanced peaceful entities, and we instead place a target on them? If they are entities who have an invitation for us to our broader cosmic reality, would this door be closed forever if we were to only label them a threat? Would this not trap us on earth with those whose only agenda is to subjugate the human population under one military power?

This is a critical topic for the destiny of our species, regardless of any previously held beliefs you may or may not care to share at this time. None of us can ignore the consequences for much longer. This is a story in full motion at this time. Can we complete it with a willful and peaceful intent?

Can we bring those intent on division and dominance towards universal dialogue and understanding? Can we bring for ourselves a lasting universal peace?

https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/weapons/a34361453/trump-acknowledges-ufos-and-threatens-aliens/