Beyond the Digital Divide: Social Networks Are Becoming Little More Than Ad Space and Sales Pitch Portals

When Elon Musk brought his sink to the headquarters of Twitter “Let that sink in” did it occur to anyone that certain realities were about to encroach on its users too? Twitter is a democratic space. Elon Musk a strong advocate for free speech must have been slightly torn by the prospect of making people pay for the privilege.

This is not a Musk hit-piece, it is an appeal to his senses directly.

Here are 10 reasons why social media, led by Musk’s Twitter is heading in the wrong direction by charging people and dividing people with subscriptions:

1. It undermines public trust in social media platforms like Twitter by creating an appearance that verified status can be bought rather than earned through authenticity.

2. It creates an unfair advantage for those who can afford to pay for verification over those who cannot, which could exacerbate existing power imbalances and make it more difficult for marginalized voices to gain traction on the platform.

3. It sets a precedent wherein verified status becomes just another product that can be purchased instead of something that must be genuinely earned, further eroding trust in online identity systems.

4. Verifying a user without proper vetting process opens up opportunity for fraudulent accounts to masquerade as legitimate sources of news, opinion, and information, potentially spreading misinformation and disinformation.

5. Paying for verification incentivizes users to prioritize their own personal brand building efforts over meaningful contribution to conversations and communities, further amplifying narcissism and selfishness already present on social media.

6. The perception created by charging for verified status fosters cynicism toward business leaders who claim to act in the interest of broader society while simultaneously profiting from individuals’ desire to appear important within specific online circles.

7. Increasing the cost of maintaining a verified account on Twitter could discourage low-income users from continuing to participate on the site, reducing overall diversity of perspectives and experiences shared.

8. Charging money for verification reinforces the idea that online interactions should be commodified or monetized, perpetuating consumer culture values rather than encouraging community oriented attitudes.

9. Adopting this practice would further contribute to Silicon Valley executives making choices that benefit themselves financially but detract from wellbeing of wider society, exacerbating concerns around income inequality and corruption among tech elites.

10. Each monetized bit of information shared on Twitter is shaped by its commercial appeal, not a revelation of ones actual value to communities. This disenfranchises the authentic in human beings. It robs us of our actual worth by prioritizing the sensational, the shallow of meaning, the controversial; as we see with YouTube and all those videos with the manic overly expressive shock face desperately trying to net viewers, set by the loudest and fastest talkers.
This contributes to that firehose of madness that is taking over the internet.

A more general issue arises if corporations begin treating valuable features previously available to everyone equally under a “universal” approach. This paradigm shift away from inclusivity runs counterintuitive to ethically responsible design patterns advocated for by experts and echoes sentiments behind the “digital divide,” a term used to describe disparities that prevent some populations from benefitting from technology fully due to structural barriers.

Overall, implementing paid verification could have ripple effects across social media and broader society. By favoring wealth over merit, people might lose faith in the ability to earn legitimacy, trust, and reputation online, ultimately shifting norms towards commercialization and transactionalism at every turn, even beyond social media (e.g., in personal relationships).

People on low income and disability payments cannot afford it, and where they can they often use phone service carriers that are not recognized by Musk’s Twitter. The results of this serve factions driven by greed.

Protest and effective protest is unlikely. People who make money from this plan dominate the attention. People who can’t pay, or won’t because of the above reasons, will not get their voices heard on social media. Political representation of these people is further endangered. This is the future of digital democracy that we were warned about.

It is becoming a reality before our eyes.

Elon Musk plans a TruthGPT AI. It is probably about time we assess what this will mean, since – with truth comes the need for compassion. What we may discover about reality as well as social and political reality will require unconditional love, to forgive one another. Otherwise the truth will divide us further.

If we can’t all share our hearts and minds on social media equally, in truth and compassion (whilst being free of the woke police, as Musk desires) we risk everything about humans becoming monetized, including truth – and therein lays the rapid path to the abyss.

Real Freedom is Freedom From the Illusion of Division

The general consensus is that our political system is corrupt and dysfunctional. So what keeps it going? As the below link implies – the largest form of ‘election interference’ comes from our emotional state. Our current system ensures we are more preoccupied with our defence of (political) ‘group’ than actual results which are directly beneficial to the issues.

Information overload means that our brains use shortcuts in understanding. The regions of the brain which generate these shortcuts are closely tied to the parts that deal with fear and our dependence on social group; reward and threat, friend or foe.

This means there is a simplistic reduction of life’s actual problems into an ‘us vs them’ mentality. Acting and thinking as part of a group alters our priorities and motives, often away from the most beneficial outcome for all.

Reducing the sense of threat (as this short clip suggests) when discussing how human affairs should be run, would be easier if we didn’t feel forced to align with a political group, ie. if a political group did not exist. Then we could simply call our way of dealing with things compassion.

#compassion #politics #psychology #election2020 #election

If We Don’t Know Love – We Know Nothing

Building bridges across the icy divide isn’t easy,.. but it is vital.

As we get older, most of us think we have a pretty decent grasp of at least the basics of survival in the current era. However, yesterday I was reminded of what my grandfather once said in the wisdom of his 80’s – that you ‘never‘ stop learning.

Sadly, not everyone can maintain that humble open-mindedness most effectively expressed by something referred to as the Socratic Paradox; Plato’s account of Socrates that: ‘the only thing I know is that I know nothing”. 

A Child of 80?
To everyone’s misfortune, some people are still self-indulged enough to keep pushing others around with their egos by this age. Worse still, they can mistake their ego for an ‘absolute’ sense of maturity and wisdom. They believe themselves impervious to any instincts that call for a proper self-examination. They are so deeply entrenched in this way of thinking (if it can be called thinking without self-awareness) that they use it as a shield to deflect the truth contained within the whole picture. 

In contrast to the ancient insights of Socrates – the absence of a humble open-mindedness is guaranteed. The only thing they know is that they (believe they) know everything, including how others should behave and even feel. In fact, they only know what an unquestioned voice seems to be telling them. 

Know Thyself to Love Thyself.
Indeed, they don’t even recognize this voice as their own. They have closed the door to love is a sad reflection of how little they actually know themselves. Consequently, the opportunity to love themselves has never presented itself to them. It is impossible for them, even for one moment, to imagine that others can see right through this. That this anger, bitterness and judgment are a red flag, they can’t even see themselves flying. We must conclude from this that life is a moment-to-moment torment for them. With this in mind, it feels only fitting that we keep the door open for their personal awakening. 

The Cause of All Anxiety
The cause of all anxiety is ‘want,’ including wanting others to be different. This blocks us from experiencing the joy of how we are different. It makes us incapable of extending the warmth we all seek to be expressed through acceptance. It also stifles others self-knowledge by disallowing them to fully come into their being. 

Many people are stuck in the fruitless quest of pathological self-judgement for their life’s duration. Through impulses towards the monkey-see-monkey-do reflex, they too often believe that since they were judged by this standard of compassionless authoritarianism, so should you. This somehow makes their own suffering, and the sacrifices they have made for it feel more justified. Consequently, they miss out on seeing the full spectrum of colours that life actually is. 

After Tens of Thousands of Years, is Humanity Really Still Stuck at this Point?
These little nuances in everyday communication have cascading and catastrophic effects, but how? It starts violently wanting others to share your opinion on things which shuts down communication. A non-starter, which it seems most people are guilty of in one shape or form. In a material world where the noise of the ego dominates, it blocks communication by turning our beliefs into objects – creating the illusion that our opinions are part of our physical selves. 

This further renders people into unshift-able adrenalin junkies, angrily defending themselves from the words of others as though they have been physically assaulted. 

What Hope is There of Change?
How lost we must be in our world of unconscious self-judgement, insecurity and inadequacies to carry on this way. Yet is it not a more conscious act of willfully forgetting the history of our own verbal abuse and neglect of others?

The lack of self-compassion is fed by the drive to deny everything about ourselves. This insistence upon our innocence makes us blind to the offence and abuse we might cause others today, including persistent self-abuse. Instead, we must be right at all costs, even at the expense of the relationships themselves.

It seems evident that some are more hooked on such unchallenged pathological patterns than others. These hidden contradictions are projected as blame – pointing the finger in each instance for how they feel about themselves. With every last fibre of their ego, they must avoid the journey of true self-knowledge beyond it.

Just a cursory look at these facts reveals that real immaturity is demonstrated by those who childishly refuse to extend the same level of compassion shown to them by others. It’s okay to read this, recognize yourself in it and feel embarrassed. That feeling has to be experienced; let the crack in the facade of the ego open. This is where the light comes in. 

The Insistence of Ego
Most will keep blocking it until their last breath; it is more important for these people to protect their egos. More critical for them to feel as though they are ‘right.’ 

They are more likely to call others ‘angry’ if they expose any of this. Meanwhile, they sit on their throne of lies they have told themselves to feel superior. They banish all mirrors from their kingdom to ensure they never get a good look at themselves.

Whether someone is transfixed on their material success or suffering from a superiority complex that stems from a sense of greater intelligence, for too many, these things are often more important than love. Is there any hope for people who are blind to their own discompassionate authoritarianism? Would they recognize love if it were to hit them in the forehead? 

If You Haven’t Learned How to Communicate Love, What Use is What You Have Learned?
There is intellectual intelligence, which is cold, scientific fact, and emotional intelligence, which is one way of describing a character trait that stems from the simple experience of love.

(Real) love does not judge. It does not point the finger, does not come from a place that wants to make others feel guilt, shame or worry. Real love carries with it authentic compassion. If you haven’t experienced this, you haven’t met yourself authentically. Genuine compassion moves naturally ‘with’ the awareness of how our own behaviour would make others feel. 

Compassion is compassion. Compassion for oneself is one and the same as compassion for others. It is not selective. It is universal, without boundaries or judgement. 

Before You Call Yourself (or Anyone Else) an Adult Again.
The greatest challenge, perhaps, is how those who lack this seemingly instinctive understanding of love have a perverted sense of righteousness about what it means to be an adult. They shun the word human and imbue the mythical status of adulthood in its place as if reaching their standard of detachment is where everyone should be. This compounds the evidence that the invented concept of being an adult has nothing to do with showing compassion towards people.

What do people think being an adult is exactly? Unhappily married with an unmanageable amount of children and an un-payable mortgage? Just vote in favour of the wars and the war on self-knowledge and self-love. Is that it? What is this adulthood without love? We see the result today.

Not So Intelligent After All?
‘Adults’ send their own children to wars and kill other human beings and children.

Adults obey the orders of compassionless authority figures; teachers, gurus, presidents, and bosses. Adults obey the unspoken order to go out to work and spend most of their lives away from their loved ones. The life mission? To fill their house with useless junk and their heads with junk ideologies that make them justify being apart from their families all day. They call this succeeding at adulthood. All at the expense of a dying planet. 

Is the message of adulthood to breed, unconsciously, have 6 kids or more and show no love and expect nothing but respect in return? Conformity to ideas approaching the advanced stages of destroying our planet – our one and only home; as Carl Sagan said, we have a duty to co-operate well enough to keep alive.

Breaking Down Barriers
In the same way that Sagan said we have to see beyond fictional National boundaries to cooperate, we have to see beyond the ideologies and values these same Capitalist systems have instilled in people. To be a human is not dependent on our ability to coldly kill our relationships while simultaneously killing the earth. This is the opposite of what Sagan meant. We won’t fix anything at all without universal compassion.

Should we brand these unconscious generations with a FAIL at the new ‘school of conscious compassion? The world is dying from unconscious obedience to desperately outdated ideas of what it means to be an ‘adult.’ With the ominous spectre of increased resource wars, we instead need to focus on healing it by understanding what it means to be a human on a planet with finite resources.

Will the earth and our relationships with one another be healed by even more branding, blaming, and hating, which leads to more wars and destruction? The answer is obvious.

Self Knowledge = Earth Healing
It takes a moment of self-awareness to begin to identify ‘the self’ – and not to simply respect the differences in others but to love them. If we are to have our own differences loved too, we must see that what resides within us is worth loving. These are the same qualities that will heal our relationships, including the most important relationship. If we can’t love ourselves, we won’t be motivated to fix the planet that sustains us. Whether we realize it or not, a love for one another is synonymous with our passion for the earth. 

We have to put an end to the obtuse and disfigured ideas of what relationships are; self-righteousness has to be replaced by self-compassion. Avoidance of self-knowledge at all costs means it is only upon our deathbeds that people grasp all of this and think: ‘Ah, I missed the point of life; the point was to love unconditionally….’

Will you wait until it is too late for your loved ones, whose souls are still crushed by the ideology of mindless consumption, before breaking free of this compulsive obedience to false doctrines of what it means to be an adult? From this, we can surely agree on one thing about maturity and responsibility; the greatest of so-called adults would surely wake up to this and become human once again.

The British Public Being Taken for Fools Over the No Deal Brexit Fiasco – Is There a Broader Plot?

Democracy is not guaranteed.

Today, a Scottish court concluded that the new Prime Minister of Britain, Boris Johnson, acted unlawfully when he suspended parliament for the next 5 weeks.
Since he had to inform the Queen of his reasons for the suspension in order to gain her approval some insist that he has also misled her.

Democracy Closed
The Queen was agreeable. Yet it seems to anyone, even those supporting Boris that the r, thate closed down parliament (and effectively democracy itself) was merelyto av
tentially calamitous ‘No Deal’ exit from the European Union.

This documentary will have you questioning just how clued out the British royalty really are to events that impact the nation on such a critical level.

It exposes a genuine military coup that was plotted against a sitting Prime Minister, Harold Wilson (Labour), with the backing of former Conservative PM Edward Heath.. and notable (royal) others.

Elite First
In any case, between them – it would be no surprise if the elite of the UK again prioritizes the maintenance of their power/structures – way above and beyond the safety of the British public.

Even after bailing out the banks and imposing austerity measures on the public, many feel that the UK is overcrowded, overst, many feel on the verge of being at one another’s th,roats.

The feeling is that this has been fuelled by an immigration policy which has simply let too many people in than the country can sustain. As more greenbelts are built on, and the National Health Service buckles to its knees, violent crime is perpetually in the news; a palpable fear is fuelled daily by more than just anecdotes and the (fake) news.

No Lessons Learned From History. Why?
Is it really possible that we have not learned the lessons of history to this extent? People of various nationalities, ethnicities and cultures have been wedged toSocio-economic tensions which led to World War Two – have been studied under a microscope. gether; under harsh economic pressures and expected not to befall the same base retraction towards hate that Germany succumbed to during its economic punishment for World War One. Socio-economic tensions which led to World War Two – have been studied under us away (or towards) these sorts of circumstances. So, which way have they engineered all of this?

Was the current climate in the UK really so unpredictable when:

– Nothing was done towards increasing the chances of successful integration?

– Nothing was done to put a ‘sustainable cap’ on the numbers entering the UK?

And, nothing was done to alleviate the economic burden on those being paid a slave wage which has not risen to match the cost of living for decades.. leaving many to subsist on a perverse and demoralizing ‘lifestyle’ of working full-time to service un-payable debt?

Yellow Hammer
A series of calamitous events forecast in the government document (Yellow Hammer) forced to be released today – has to be taken seriously. This document warns of serious protests and counter-protests and ensuing riots.

If there was such a serious list of threats to national security as a consequence of a No Deal exit from the EU, why hasn’t there been an intervention? Why wasn’t there an intervention earlier? Just what have they been doing?

Is the alternative of stopping Brexit deemed an even worst-case scenario for British national security?

Or, is the intervention happening by ‘way’ of the foreseeable consequences of a No Deal? They want this to happen, profit from the mass overpopulation, and drawdown and entrench their more authoritarian positions when the predictable ensuing chaos happens?

Capitalizing On Chaos
Is this a win-win for the establishment, and the foreseeable unrest from either path is something they can capitalize on?

No matter which way you stand on Brexit the ensuing panic and disorder to come (which I have had it from people in author,ity is not an unfounded fear) will be setting the cat amonhe very skittish pigeons right now.

Unless we pul togesetead of aiming anger at one another, we will undoubtedly be the ones who suffer the most.

If People Don’t Work Together – With Compassion
When democracy is at stake, no matter which nation, we have no idea how deep that suffering can go until we get there. It is up to us to stop it from getting that far. Don’t let those who gain from chaos take away the power of our compassion and the power to work together.

Stay safe.

If We Don’t Love the Earth, We are at War with it.

Our Only Home: The Amazon, Africa and the Arctic are currently in flames.. you know the rest if we don’t awaken to our love of the earth.

We need to have a conversation. We can’t go on like this. Something has to give... etc.

Sound familiar?

It is a human trait to hide from the truth when a relationship ends. Yet, we are distracted by loyalties that are past their use-by date.

Why else do we prioritize our day-to-day relationships over our relationship with the earth; if the end of this life-sustaining relationship we all share means the end of all other kinds of relationships?

Why do people continue to ignore it?

The love for your children is the same love for the earth – whether we want to recognize this or not, it is a reality. Forget this love, and you can forget your children’s futures. We both ignore the truth and simultaneously keep voting for the same political structures that led to the resource wars (of which Iraq is so widely accepted as being (oil). Unsustainable and unconscious voting means we are at war with nature. This means we are at war with ourselves. Since we ‘are’ inseparable from the earth’s ecology that sustains us and inseparable from the planet itself, we are nature.

Love of the Superficial
We have killed our relationship with the earth and diverted that attention to a superficial love of material objects, love of money, the things that bring us temporary pleasure over the things that can bring us permanent peace. We are so attached to these things we would instead take the side of the superficial, the artificial. The appeal? It provides the foundation for the fear that we are being forced to have some of these items pried from our fingers to help others and even realize it is to help ourselves.

Let’s face it, some of us are more stubborn, self-serving and inwards looking than others. We are like children who won’t let go of something we are not supposed to play with.

Population Control – Bernie’s Wrong Approach
This inward-looking behaviour is widespread, even among those willing to deliver the message. Bernie Saunders recently mentioned population control due to human overpopulation and overconsumption in such an inward-looking manner it may finish his run for the Presidency. He missed the opportunity to describe how many resources less poor countries actually use, such as the United States:

The United States, with less than 5 % of the global population, uses about a quarter of the world’s fossil fuel resources—burning up nearly 25 % of the coal, 26 % of the oil, and 27 % of the world’s natural gas.” – The State of Consumption Today – World Watch.

His mention of limiting ‘brown babies’ will boost the speed at which the already irrational knee-jerk reaction to the words ‘population control’ will explode – exponentially, destroying both his chances and the chances of intelligent debate on our pathological level of self-entitlement.

Nationalist Fear Rules the Day – and May Well End It.

Yet, the dominant nationalist sentiments that currently prevail and arm themselves, even in space, will keep winning through the ‘hate’ response to the collective fear over what is happening to this planet.

Yet, to note what is happening to the planet is not passive observation. We are doing it, and what we are doing can be stopped. One way or another, it will be destroyed.

The hate for people who say we can’t have certain things to save the planet will continue. Just as it appears inevitable that these same people will cling ever more tightly to the outdated concepts and political systems.

At the same time, what else can the rest of us do but try? We have to help people to stop reacting emotionally to the ideas of what are really tiny sacrifices and invite them to intelligently – consider the facts.

This means we have to agree on one thing, as difficult as it currently is to imagine. We have to stop voting for a system that depends on infinite resources from a finite planet. Even many Green Parties worldwide are dependent on these same unsustainable Capitalist economic policies.

Votes on Policies Not Politicians?

We need to consider a new kind of democracy, starting with a resource-based economy, where we vote for policy, not (paid) politicians. This begins with a tiny personal realization about our oneness with nature. You aren’t afraid to say you love your children, so why can’t we say we love the earth? Anything less than this willingness is where ignorance meets diabolical stubbornness, which may prove there was never any love or connection to the reality we were all born into in the first place.

To stop the madness, we have to stop the turmoil within. This is an eschatological question, a time of our self-judgment as a species. Not God’s judgment, but the critical existential question; if we can’t wake up and save ourselves by loving the earth, what are we all doing here?

Knowledge. To share,.. or not to share?

“There can be freedom from knowledge only when the process of gathering, the motive of accumulation, is understood. The desire to store up is the desire to be secure, to be certain. This desire for certainty through identification, through condemnation and justification, is the cause of fear, which destroys all communion. When there is communion, there is no need for accumulation. Accumulation is self-enclosing resistance, and knowledge strengthens this resistance. The worship of knowledge is a form of idolatry, and it will not dissolve the conflict and misery of our life. The cloak of knowledge conceals but can never liberate us from our ever increasing confusion and sorrow. The ways of the mind do not lead to truth and its happiness. To know is to deny the unknown.” – Krishnamurti

This incredible wisdom of Krishnamurti above reminds me of how contradictory I sound when I tell myself that I have one last attempt at accumulating and sharing ‘knowledge.’ 

I believe that I have an insight or two left and think it will help people focus on the nature of our reality and even save it from destruction. 

I have always felt a sense of devotion to emotional callings that concern the direction of humankind, rather than being obsessed with ego and self-material gain. I think I am being altruistic and expressing my universal compassion – by planning to share it. 

Yet I simultaneously feel in synchronicity with the awareness that ‘what we resist persists. Is sharing knowledge of and asking people to save themselves from even a calamitous injustice to humanity somehow giving energy to it?

What else to do? To share or not to share? What would you do? What ‘will’ you do?

Tolerance is Not Love

Capitalism has driven a wedge between us. The manner in which the competitive economic system appeals to us for tolerance towards one another has stolen our sincere connection to compassion.

Love is not something to be negotiated as part of some economic transaction. Tolerance towards one another results from conflict within our own minds leading to wars as nations and conflict within our own circle of friends or family. Tolerance can only lead to more conflict since it is not genuine love or compassion.

Tolerance is behaviour more akin to a settlement, an agreement to not do harm, to just statically exist and leave one another alone.
This is not love.

Love is an action towards something, an expression of the underlying truth we ignore and replace with the fatally flawed notion of tolerance.


“Tolerance is not compassion, it’s a thing put together by the cunning mind. Tolerance is the reaction from intolerance; but neither the tolerant nor the intolerant will ever be compassionate. Without love, all so-called good action can only lead to further mischief and misery. A mind that’s ambitious, seeking power, does not know love, and it will never be compassionate. Love is not reform, but total action.”

Krishnamurti