If We Don’t Love the Earth, We are at War with it.

Our Only Home: The Amazon, Africa and the Arctic are currently in flames.. you know the rest if we don’t awaken to our love of the earth.

We need to have a conversation. We can’t go on like this. Something has to give... etc.

Sound familiar?

It is a human trait to hide from the truth when a relationship ends. Yet, we are distracted by loyalties that are past their use-by date.

Why else do we prioritize our day-to-day relationships over our relationship with the earth; if the end of this life-sustaining relationship we all share means the end of all other kinds of relationships?

Why do people continue to ignore it?

The love for your children is the same love for the earth – whether we want to recognize this or not, it is a reality. Forget this love, and you can forget your children’s futures. We both ignore the truth and simultaneously keep voting for the same political structures that led to the resource wars (of which Iraq is so widely accepted as being (oil). Unsustainable and unconscious voting means we are at war with nature. This means we are at war with ourselves. Since we ‘are’ inseparable from the earth’s ecology that sustains us and inseparable from the planet itself, we are nature.

Love of the Superficial
We have killed our relationship with the earth and diverted that attention to a superficial love of material objects, love of money, the things that bring us temporary pleasure over the things that can bring us permanent peace. We are so attached to these things we would instead take the side of the superficial, the artificial. The appeal? It provides the foundation for the fear that we are being forced to have some of these items pried from our fingers to help others and even realize it is to help ourselves.

Let’s face it, some of us are more stubborn, self-serving and inwards looking than others. We are like children who won’t let go of something we are not supposed to play with.

Population Control – Bernie’s Wrong Approach
This inward-looking behaviour is widespread, even among those willing to deliver the message. Bernie Saunders recently mentioned population control due to human overpopulation and overconsumption in such an inward-looking manner it may finish his run for the Presidency. He missed the opportunity to describe how many resources less poor countries actually use, such as the United States:

The United States, with less than 5 % of the global population, uses about a quarter of the world’s fossil fuel resources—burning up nearly 25 % of the coal, 26 % of the oil, and 27 % of the world’s natural gas.” – The State of Consumption Today – World Watch.

His mention of limiting ‘brown babies’ will boost the speed at which the already irrational knee-jerk reaction to the words ‘population control’ will explode – exponentially, destroying both his chances and the chances of intelligent debate on our pathological level of self-entitlement.

Nationalist Fear Rules the Day – and May Well End It.

Yet, the dominant nationalist sentiments that currently prevail and arm themselves, even in space, will keep winning through the ‘hate’ response to the collective fear over what is happening to this planet.

Yet, to note what is happening to the planet is not passive observation. We are doing it, and what we are doing can be stopped. One way or another, it will be destroyed.

The hate for people who say we can’t have certain things to save the planet will continue. Just as it appears inevitable that these same people will cling ever more tightly to the outdated concepts and political systems.

At the same time, what else can the rest of us do but try? We have to help people to stop reacting emotionally to the ideas of what are really tiny sacrifices and invite them to intelligently – consider the facts.

This means we have to agree on one thing, as difficult as it currently is to imagine. We have to stop voting for a system that depends on infinite resources from a finite planet. Even many Green Parties worldwide are dependent on these same unsustainable Capitalist economic policies.

Votes on Policies Not Politicians?

We need to consider a new kind of democracy, starting with a resource-based economy, where we vote for policy, not (paid) politicians. This begins with a tiny personal realization about our oneness with nature. You aren’t afraid to say you love your children, so why can’t we say we love the earth? Anything less than this willingness is where ignorance meets diabolical stubbornness, which may prove there was never any love or connection to the reality we were all born into in the first place.

To stop the madness, we have to stop the turmoil within. This is an eschatological question, a time of our self-judgment as a species. Not God’s judgment, but the critical existential question; if we can’t wake up and save ourselves by loving the earth, what are we all doing here?

US Media: “UFO’s Invading”. Why now?

The media’s recent language usage was unthinkable just a few years ago. By placing the words “UFOs” and “invading” in the same sentence, the author appears to assume we will leap to a particular conclusion. Namely that we will connect the notion of any such aerial phenomenon to being both non-human and a ‘threat.’

This brings another word to mind – ‘fakery’ – since they might know what these things are, but wish to raise a high sense of fear about them for a reason.

The suspicion is easily raised when you consider a few logical assumptions based on these developments, and how what they want us to believe about them is flawed.

Logical assumption:

#1) If these were aliens, wouldn’t they want to contact humans to ensure we do not mistake them as a threat?

2) Keeping in mind humans have to date only achieved putting a man on a moon, not even on our closest neighbour – Mars. If ETs were a threat, and they possess the technology to traverse vast interstellar distances, they would also have mastered the technology to wipe out humans instantly, without us even knowing it happened.

3) Aerial phenomenon (human engineered drones) filmed over Area 51 in the 1990s, making maneuvers that defied current understanding of physics, are logically to blame for some of what has been filmed by US Navy jets in recent years times and reported in multiple mainstream media outlets.

4) This act of generating a fake (ET) threat; has been called ‘the ultimate false flag operation’ for decades.

Dr. Carol Rosin, who worked with the father of rocketry himself, Wernher Von Braun, said that he told her that there was such a plan in the making (over several decades) towards a ‘fake alien invasion.’

Just keep that in mind. The secret technology exists to make your jaw drop. Combine this secret tech with the holographic technology of today, and we are looking for potential for immense fakery and the realization of objectives which will also remain unknown to us.
I understand this looks like paranoid conspiracy talk. Still, I am not one for conspiracies, and none of this is adding up.

5) At a time of severe planetary threat from human over-consumption, overpopulation.. climate change… what on earth could the system have planned to ‘take care’ of us all? The sums don’t add up, and they don’t appear to be concerned enough.

We have a planet based on false economics because; Capitalism demands infinite growth. It is impossible to have unlimited growth on a planet with finite resources. It makes sense that the elite may have something in place to take care of this peacefully. If they have something non-peaceful, they will keep it to themselves.

The question is if they have something to address the multiple crises – ‘why’ are they keeping any such solution to themselves?

6) Why all this, about UFOs and non-human intelligences now? Why else now?

#climatechange #aliens #UFO’s #UAPs #FakeAlienInvasion #AlienInvasion #6thMassExtinction #ExtinctionRebellion #falseflag #theultimatefalseflag #overpopulation #overconsumption