Nick Pope is usually happy to sound off on his fears over the potential existence of aliens/UFOs despite the overwhelming footage and sightings of UFOs being non-violent in nature, and evidence for the ‘threat narrative’ is still scarce.
However, considering his warning from his Twitter account about a patent for some genuinely mind-boggling technology, we may all wish to take a second look.
If such technology has indeed fallen into the hands of people whose focus is war rather than the capacity to bring peace and equality to the world through free and clean energy, we are in serious trouble.
This so-called ‘UFO patent’ for a ‘time-space modification weapon’ can ‘make the Hydrogen bomb seem more like a firecracker and is more powerful than the sun. Such outlandish claims pose many questions; who is pursuing this, and why would they let any potential perceived adversaries know they have followed it? The usual logic is that military agencies want to throw the enemy off the actual truth.
Propaganda Strategy? Some nations want the world to believe they have all sorts of exotic weapons technology and declare it publicly to make their adversaries feel like they have to share their own counter technology. They would also achieve this by allaying the fears of their country’s population that they are vulnerable to the opposing side.
This seems like an overshoot unless there is the suspicion that Russia or China do indeed poses such high-level UFO back-engineered weapons technology. Otherwise, letting the world know this sort of thing is in your weapons inventory may just fuel motivations to prepare to take countermeasures against it. Not a good way to signal your intentions and capabilities.
A New Level of Fear After everything we feel we have been through lately, do we have more room for the fear narrative to be cranked up to a whole new level? Suppose we live in this fantasy narrative where spacetime modification weapons have been back-engineered from alien technology (either through cooperation or crashed vehicles). In that case, Nick Pope is correct. There is a near-infinite catalogue of examples provided by science fiction for us to fear the unpredictable outcomes. Still, the room for its abuse and misuse is simply an unfathomable, unknowable quantity.
This technology does not have to fall into the hands of world leaders with despotic ambitions to pose a danger. Any secret organization behind the scenes that keeps this sort of weaponry secret poses a potential threat to the entire planet. This is the reason why democracy exists. Without public oversight of such projects, how can there be oversight of the political persuasions and ambitions of those who have exclusive access to them?
This would be especially concerning when the technology is more powerful than all the world’s so-called conventional weapons combined. So, it begs the question, who is really in charge here? Why are they letting this go on? Is this project fear at its peak? Is this only the beginning of an entirely new reality where the ending is out of our hands? Or are we entering a period where we have to raise our collective consciousness to a completely new level if we want to survive and live in peace?
The narration in this 1-minute clip says our DNA is “..not so human after all”. Yet this could also simply (or not so simply) mean that being human means more than we have so far imagined. Professor of Microbiology and Immunology at Stanford University, Dr. Garry Nolan, would no doubt agree; we literally require a wider, prismatic look upon our reality to be capable of perceiving the possibilities.
Our ancestral past location and present are combined to mean something we are now remembering; through science and exploration of (thus far) unexplained phenomena. This is also marked by a new openness by scientists to investigate the origin of consciousness and the cosmos.
The true nature of Unidentified Flying Objects is a topic held in a vice of hardened beliefs. The UFOology community is divided down lines of frenetic insistence. This is divided by but not exclusive to binary views. First is the belief that every sighting threatens human civilization and is evil in origin. Secondly, the insights of Dr. Greer / Cameron Grant – that aliens have peaceful intentions and exist somewhere between the material plane we occupy and the inter-dimensional origins of consciousness.
A Rational View? The latter is based on the idea that any civilization that has lived long enough not to destroy itself has mastered peaceful coexistence with all other lifeforms.
Additionally, to master interstellar / inter-dimensional travel, they will have to understand physics akin to realizing the oneness principles of the cosmos; an advanced living comprehension of Cosmic Karma – what one does to others, one does to oneself. Harming us would be harming themselves.
What the Rest Think The remainder of the public sit outside of this circle. They range from being pro-active balkers to mildly inquisitive fence-sitters. They also consist of those who claim that sightings by ‘trained military observers’ are explained by secret technology held by either the US and /or other major military powers of the world.
Others propose that smaller states could have invested strongly in secret military technology rather than in conventional weapons soon to be rendered obsolete by the speed at which the science, drone technology, AI.. are moving.
The Most Likely of Unlikelies? There is another half-way-meets-all consideration. This viewpoint states that the relatively recent sightings and videos released by the Pentagon could be secret technology that has been back-engineered from crashed UFO/s at incidents such as Roswell in New Mexico, 1947.
This theory usually follows a line of reasoning that those responsible for researching such powerful technology will have learned the lessons of nuclear proliferation. i.e. that – at all costs – the all-powerful back-engineered alien technology cannot be allowed to fall into the hands of adversary nations.
Personal Insights This author has communicated with people, including icons from across the UFO community, including:
– Nick Pope (Former British Ministry of Defence / touted in mainstream media as ‘The Real Life X-files Guy),
– Dr. Garry Nolan (Former member To The Stars Academy and Professor of Microbiology and Immunology at Stanford University & known for controversially debunking the genetic origins of the alien Atacama mummy),
– George Knapp (Once pioneering journalist asking all the right questions about the activities at Area 51),
– Jeremy Corbell (director of Hunt for the Skinwalker and Bob Lazar: Area 51 & Flying Saucers).
Although all of the above have either outwardly stated or implied their beliefs that the nature of the UFO phenomenon represents a potential threat, I am still nowhere near convinced. I have maintained an open mind; otherwise, my insights are meaningless.
By contrast, many of the above claim to be unsure of the origins of UFOs yet have contradicted themselves by ceasing to ask the full range of questions available while calling them a threat. They have opted for something akin to: “I don’t know what they are, but they must be dangerous, that’s all I know, that – and – they go fast! Whew, do they go fast, and we should learn how to do that.’ (really).
Objectivity in Question In 2017 / 18, I was more actively engaged within the community for research purposes. I was often put off by the outward aggressiveness displayed by supporters of the alien threat narrative. I was even turfed out of a social media group on the topic for expressing my open-mindedness regardless of how politely I communicated.
Thus questions surrounding their own ability to remain objective on the topic persisted for me. Are they too closely associated with those who want to defend the total secrecy of the actual origins of the technology until the last minute for the strategic benefit of those in (ultimate) power?
Set-Up for Fear Since then, the list of those who have fallen in line with the fear agenda has expanded. Suppose you have been following the news since 2017 when the now-infamous Tic Tac footage taken from a US Navy jet of a UFO was released. In that case,, you will have noticed the increasingly serious position mainstream news readers are taking on the topic. This is despite many other videos being promised via the To The Stars Academy. Only two more have emerged since the (perhaps unexpected extent to which the) public was able to debunk the proposition that these crafts are with 100% certainty non-human in origin.
This was followed by two seasons of the TV show ‘Unidentified’ by the To The Stars Academy on the History Channel, which cleverly compounded the alien threat narrative by detailing a long list of military witnesses to similar events along the US coast and elsewhere, but primarily the US.
Confused Context: Mainstream Joins the Threat Narrative When a reporter recently asked Trump about the recently announced a Depart of Defence UFO Task Force to investigate reports of UFOs, his answers provided the UFO community with yet more reasons to tighten the vice on previously held beliefs.
Leapfrogging Logic Popular Mechanics (and other news media such as The Independent) ran with the idea that Trump just ‘threatened’ aliens. As a science news outlet, this is bizarre because it has completely neglected logic by leap-frogging the same discussions absent for the last 3 years and beyond.
There has been a distinct absence of attempts to ask common-sense questions if we are indeed heralding a new era of reality for humankind – where the confirmation of the existence of non-human intelligences was about to happen:
– What attempts at contact with these crafts have been made?
– What communications have been received back?
– If they have been determined a threat, why hasn’t this been discussed at the United Nations? etc.
Such an absence of common sense questions leads one to ask: Suppose recent UFO sightings by the US military aren’t part of US weapons. Why has reference to the Advanced Aerospace Weapon Systems Applications Program (AAWSAP), which was tasked with investigating UFOs, been removed from the common online lexicon? (*At the time of writing, this was the case. A search for the term would lead to nothing but useless links with vague mention of it). The name AAWSAP seems to have been leaked and caused embarrassment for those pushing the threat narrative.
Engineering the Fake Alien Invasion Additionally, such an interpretation of Trump’s recent words as a threat towards aliens is alarmist to those within the UFO community who have long been aware of the Last Card Warning to Dr. Carol Rosin via father of rocketry and NASA, Wernher Von Braun. Von Braun warned Carol that there was a planned fake alien invasion on the cards by those behind the scenes. He told her it would be an excuse to weaponize space, declare Marshal Law and take total control of the earth with new and secret technology.
Location is Everything Thus statements by Trump (below) have reawakened suspicion over the origins purpose of these UFOs sightings since – if the so-called UFOs belonged to the US, it would explain why they have been filmed buzzing mostly US Navy pilots over the coast of the United States. ie. If an accident were to occur, the priceless reverse-engineered technology would be recovered within US territory – thus not falling into the wrong hands.
Reading Between the Lines of Fear and Threat Considering all of the above, along withthe third-way proposition – that UFOs are mostly US hardware back-engineered from crashed UFOs, we get a different reading on Trump’s recent statements.
First, consider Trump’s own response to being asked the following: “Can you explain why the Department of Defence has set up a UFO task force? Are there UFOs?”
Trump: “I will tell you this: We have now created a military the likes of which we have never had before. In terms of equipment, the—the equipment we have, the weapons we have and hope to god we never have to use it. But have created a military the likes of which nobody has, nobody has ever had. Russia, China they’re all envious of what we had. All built in the USA. We’ve rebuilt it all—$2.5 trillion. As far as the other question, I’ll check on it; I heard about it two days ago, actually.”
The ‘other question‘ which he promises to check on is obviously in response to the setting up of a Department of Defence UFO task force since he also said in the same breath, “I heard about it two days ago,” ie. He hasn’t heard about UFOs until just two days ago.
This clarifies that it is in answer to the second part of the question, “Are there UFOs,” that he appears to brag about US military power. But why? While many interpreted this as meaning Don’t worry – I know about the aliens, and we can beat them, I instead took this to mean that recent reports, videos and sightings of UFOs are, in fact, hidden US military technology.
We should pause to consider the implications of this, as this opens up a whole culture of investigation in the UFO/UAP topic if this was his meaning.
– “A military the likes of which we have never had before.” It can’t be conventional weapons he is talking about for it to be different from before.
– “We’ve rebuilt it all.“ Rebuilt it all – speaks for itself. This sounds like a complete renewal of hardware, not simple maintenance or up-grade of conventional weapons.
– “Rebuilt it all” … “In terms of the equipment.” We really couldn’t get more specific than if he came out and said, ‘we replaced the equipment with back-engineered UFOs technology.’ This is pinpointing the hardware directly.
– “A military the likes of which nobody has ever had.” A military the likes of which nobody has ever had would likely entail technology that no one has ever seen before, especially given the previous statement on equipment.
Also, we can’t forget that Trump has frequently and publicly bragged about his own preference for surprise attacks; military tactics are summed up by ‘Don’t tell them what you’ve got and don’t tell them you are coming!’
2) Possible Hint within the Article: The article also hints at this by stating, ‘the president has spent approximately $2.5 trillion on defence, though there’s been no real increase in America’s overall military strength and number of weapons.’ There has been no actual increase in overall military strength. So where has the $2.5 trillion gone if not to projects behind the scenes?
Again, to refer to Trump’s own words in this context: “We’ve built it all – $2.5 trillion.” Built all what (?) with 2.5 trillion dollars if there is ‘no increase in overall military strength’ as far as the public can see?
So, once more, my key question is: by Trump answering with the above when asked, “Are there UFOs” – was he indicating that UFOs are, for the most part, in fact, US military technology?
Of course, this does not discount the possibility of these being back-engineered UFOs, meaning UFO fans could still get their disclosure this way. ie. When the new tech is unveiled, the source will be revealed.
The Remaining – Critical Questions – How far will any President be persuaded to go along with the UFO threat narrative and use the technology to enforce agendas beyond the ability of both the public and Congress to fully assess the facts?
Think about this. What we cannot assess independently is not verifiable via democratic means.
– How quickly would any President be persuaded to unleash such firepower before we have had the chance to communicate with said intelligences?
If the situation is dictated by technology beyond our imagination and developed beyond democratic oversight, literally anything can happen.
– What would our use of technology that can travel far beyond orbit mean for our immediate diplomatic relations with any non-human intelligences?
How would we know whether non-human intelligences will take full exception to us going into orbit with such weapons with the determination that they are a threat? We are relative newcomers to the broader cosmic stage. We aren’t even sure if our own solar system is inhabited by an unseen intelligence. How would we know if we are breaking interspecies etiquette?
What does it mean for the destiny of human consciousness itself if UFOs are indeed explainable by Dr. Greer’s understanding of them being highly advanced peaceful entities, and we instead place a target on them? If they are entities who have an invitation for us to our broader cosmic reality, would this door be closed forever if we were to only label them a threat? Would this not trap us on earth with those whose only agenda is to subjugate the human population under one military power?
This is a critical topic for the destiny of our species, regardless of any previously held beliefs you may or may not care to share at this time. None of us can ignore the consequences for much longer. This is a story in full motion at this time. Can we complete it with a willful and peaceful intent?
Can we bring those intent on division and dominance towards universal dialogue and understanding? Can we bring for ourselves a lasting universal peace?
The media’s recent language usage was unthinkable just a few years ago. By placing the words “UFOs” and “invading” in the same sentence, the author appears to assume we will leap to a particular conclusion. Namely that we will connect the notion of any such aerial phenomenon to being both non-human and a ‘threat.’
This brings another word to mind – ‘fakery’ – since they might know what these things are, but wish to raise a high sense of fear about them for a reason.
The suspicion is easily raised when you consider a few logical assumptions based on these developments, and how what they want us to believe about them is flawed.
Logical assumption:
#1) If these were aliens, wouldn’t they want to contact humans to ensure we do not mistake them as a threat?
2) Keeping in mind humans have to date only achieved putting a man on a moon, not even on our closest neighbour – Mars. If ETs were a threat, and they possess the technology to traverse vast interstellar distances, they would also have mastered the technology to wipe out humans instantly, without us even knowing it happened.
3) Aerial phenomenon (human engineered drones) filmed over Area 51 in the 1990s, making maneuvers that defied current understanding of physics, are logically to blame for some of what has been filmed by US Navy jets in recent years times and reported in multiple mainstream media outlets.
4) This act of generating a fake (ET) threat; has been called ‘the ultimate false flag operation’ for decades.
Dr. Carol Rosin, who worked with the father of rocketry himself, Wernher Von Braun, said that he told her that there was such a plan in the making (over several decades) towards a ‘fake alien invasion.’
Just keep that in mind. The secret technology exists to make your jaw drop. Combine this secret tech with the holographic technology of today, and we are looking for potential for immense fakery and the realization of objectives which will also remain unknown to us. I understand this looks like paranoid conspiracy talk. Still, I am not one for conspiracies, and none of this is adding up.
5) At a time of severe planetary threat from human over-consumption, overpopulation.. climate change… what on earth could the system have planned to ‘take care’ of us all? The sums don’t add up, and they don’t appear to be concerned enough.
We have a planet based on false economics because; Capitalism demands infinite growth. It is impossible to have unlimited growth on a planet with finite resources. It makes sense that the elite may have something in place to take care of this peacefully. If they have something non-peaceful, they will keep it to themselves.
The question is if they have something to address the multiple crises – ‘why’ are they keeping any such solution to themselves?
6) Why all this, about UFOs and non-human intelligences now? Why else now?
In his latest article, the Director of Special Programs at the ‘To The Stars Academy,’ Luis Elizondo, raises the need to maintain what I have been calling a #PrismaticPerception.
He describes the type of open-mindedness it might take to understand what is behind sightings of UFOs, or UAPs as they are now being referred to (Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon).
All options are being left open for the public to ponder; are the latest sightings of Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon from; outer space, exo-terrestrials (beings that have been on earth long before humans), pan-dimensional beings (beings able to exist in multiple dimensions), human technology from a clandestine government programs, fulfilment of religious prophecy or a mysterious combination of all of the above?
This is to say, we should keep the broadest range of possibilities open. When we are done, we may still not even be able to definitively conclude their origin.
In raising such playful mind wandering, he also opens the door to some deeply paranoid pondering about UFOs having a religious significance. Some might say that this suggests a highly questionable intention since nothing this man says is by accident.
Luis Elizondo’s Profile Description on the To The Stars website
Unelected Power Since this is a private company – the title of Director of Global Security’ is not awarded via public consultation or democratic process. Nor is it even given by the United Nations. So, presumably, it arrived from behind-the-scenes collective knowledge.
Much of this knowledge may come from research conducted by a team highly experienced in their respective fields at the TTSA. However, outside of the organization have not been invited to verify any of their claims. It appears they are in no rush for this to take place.
We are dying to know; what the world is so threatened by when it comes to the possibility of non-human, pan-dimensional or semi-human intelligences? Why does this require a person to be assigned the title Director of Global Security? Why such a title via a private company and based on information hidden away from the rest of the world?
Some have said that the act of hiding itself may indicate that it is already known what these things are. It may also suggest that the so-called solution has already been decided (also behind closed doors). Therefore we can ask if the actual operation is to get the public onside?
How sad if this is true. Any attempt at talks with ‘ETs’ would be shelved indefinitely. This means there will be no historic moment where an attempt is made by a globally represented humanity to decide a rational response to facts that will have been made transparent.
Instead, there will be a nationalist-based claim of a global threat and presumably a global response assembled by that nation; before the world has even had a chance to review and respond to any (independently verified) facts.
Of course, this raises much more serious questions about what could really be going on? e.g. ‘Is the origin of the apparent threat being deliberately obscured for the supreme empowerment of that nation, or at least one group of people within one nation?‘
Indescribable? No profile description – despite the calls for public investment in their company.
‘To The Stars Academy’ have no Twitter profile description. Even more mysterious it has no Wikipedia page. This is odd for a company said to be so dependent on raising public interest and investment.
(What is with the) Paranoia Inducing Propaganda?
Even more concerning is the escalation in its public messaging despite its desire to simultaneously hold on to what it might know. A forthcoming documentary on the History Channel will apparently reveal more about what they have discovered about the origins of metals from supposedly downed UAPs/UFOs.
Similar television programs have indeed presented fake documentaries as fact in the past. In the Discovery channel’s ‘Submarine – giant shark – Discovery channel documentary,’ actors gave interviews as actual witnesses to the beast. Therefore, we should proceed to view this with caution and a broader sense of open-mindedness to what could really be at play here.
Unanswered Questions
Where do we go from here? As I did over a year ago, we could start by asking, ‘Why not take this information about UFOs/UAPs to the United Nations where it can be presented for collective analysis to determine if it is a Global Security threat’? Then, if necessary, it can be assigned a unified global response rather than a national call to arms‘
Instead of rolling out with questionable documentaries and slow release of highly contentious videos of what could be secretly developed human technology, it seems logical, fair and even humane that a global security threat should be addressed globally,.. does it not?
The silence to this question has a cascade of possible implications: How far along have secret technology programs reached? Are they well beyond the hope of democratic control, where both the secrecy and the power have become too overwhelming to maintain? Is the firepower in place to face these threats and the threats themselves actually the same phenomena?
The meaning of the acronym AAWSAP (Advanced Aerospace Weapons Systems Application Program), the secret government program said to have been studying UFOs/UAPs, seems to suggest this is highly likely.
A Predictable and Emotive Cult Response
Whatever the answers – obviously, there is the desire being deliberately generated for the public to be curious about what UFOs/UAPs actually are. This could be interpreted as a good thing if they are both real and a proven threat; we are entitled to be prepared somehow, right?
At this point, I should issue a brief warning about the onslaught of bullying for those trying to maintain an open mind while in discussion with people in the UFO community. You will encounter many who are determined that all UFO sightings are, without a doubt, of alien origin.
The pressure from such people is fuelled by the fact they feel they have been fighting for the government to disclose what they know about the existence of extraterrestrials for eons. Hence they won’t take kindly to what they many interpret as talk about any hidden human origin for these sightings.
End Times Nudge We Can All Do Without
The knee-jerk and overly simplistic equation made by them is that – to doubt the TTSA is to also question the existence of UFOs. When in fact, many believe in the presence of an intelligence previously unknown to mankind here on earth – while at the same time doubting the intentions of the TTSA are universally compassionate. It really does not take that much of a sophisticated mind to entertain such a position.
This is incredibly frustrating when we consider the implications of claims by Elizondo that UAPs could be of religious significance.
“..it (UFOs /UAPs) could have a spiritual/religious relevance. As unsettling as the idea may be, it is still a possibility.“
Luis Elizondo
Why would it be ‘unsettling‘ for UFO’s/UAPs to have a spiritual or religious relevance? Wouldn’t religious people think it would be ‘nice’ if we were being visited by higher beings from a holy place? Instead, it appears that a particular type of devilish fear is being sown.
The unquestioning zealotry from the UFO community, ie. that ‘To The Stars-denial’ is akin to denial of the existence of aliens, already overwhelms public discussion. By this measure, we might expect a greatly magnified response among the passions of End Times believing right-wing Christians if they link ETs with demons.
Mutually Assured Distraction
So, the ‘former’ intelligence officer has opened the door to UFOs/UAPs? Then, for many, it is almost closed with his reference to the possibility that their appearances could have religious meaning?
There will be only one winner from such misplaced energy, and it won’t be the mentally ill or emotionally vulnerable. Just watch the debates unfold; they (TTSA) certainly will be watching.
At least one person I know has been following these events closely since the New York Times published this story on the Nimitz Navy Jet encounter with a UFO/UAP has been taken into a mental health facility due to their over-thinking on the subject. How can this reaction not be a consideration in the build-up to TTSA-driven Disclosure? Some think it is a consideration and that there can be many ways to capitalize on such collective paranoia if it were to be deliberately induced.
Conveniently, or rather inconveniently for the sane, we have an Evangelical End Times believing pastor whispering in the ear of the current President.
Around about now, your incredulity at the charade might be justifiably exorcised and replaced by a sincere sense of alarm.
The Weaponization of Mind-Space
In this context, the apparently pointless Space Force announced by Trump now seems like a timely idea – doesn’t it? Will the current President be ready to present the full Weaponization of Space as his final solution? At the very least, it appears timely. Just when Trump will be seeking re-election, a documentary about the possibility of alien threats will be released on the History Channel.
The Space Force is going ahead. There is a potential threat of aliens/demons from space. As insane as this sounds, who will complain or possess the power to prevent the unfolding of what seems to be a pro-active delusion? It all seems rather a black and white fact to many who have an agenda to maintain.
Not many are familiar with the threats that the Weaponization of Space poses to the entire world. The advances in cell vaporizing plasma laser technology and what could go wrong if that firepower surpasses the control of the US Congress. Indeed, Trump has already signed off on creating the 6th branch of the military (the Space Force). In doing so, he managed to bypass the constitutional obligation of gaining the approval of Congress.
India recently fired a missile into space, destroying one of its own satellites. In the process, it turned the resulting fragments into shards speeding faster than bullets in multiple directions. This is an appropriate metaphor for the unpredictable consequences of current momentum building towards the Weaponization of Space. The room for complete disaster and abuse of such raw and untamed power from above is immeasurable.
War in space means hell on earth. Peace in Space means Peace on Earth. Yet, who among us is ready to discuss all of this? It all seems so ridiculous and far removed from our everyday lives.
However, if we wish to maintain the mundanity that affords us peace, our tendency towards blind faith (in anything) must be addressed. It must be included when calling for an open-minded inquiry into the facts.
This hinges on keeping a high standard for what we consider to serve as evidence for the existence of non-human intelligences and asking the questions that really matter. We need to ask all the questions and if you finally get an answer, ask even more. Never stop asking; our lives may depend on it.
The Prismatic Journalist 